The Mid-Town Beach Renourishment and Expansion Project, conducted
between January 19 and February 21, 2003, placed approximately 1.2
million cubic yards of beach quality sand from an offshore borrow area
onto a 2.4 mile segment of shoreline in the Town of Palm Beach. The
project was constructed between Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) monuments R-90.4 and R-101.4. This was the first
renourishment of the original 1995-1996 Mid-Town project that included
placement of 880,000 cubic yards of sand between R-95 and R-100 and
included construction of 11 groins.
An environmental monitoring program was conducted to determine if
the project affected biological communities associated with hardbottom
formations immediately seaward of the equilibrium toe of fill, and
to assess effects to green turtle foraging habitat. The project monitors
five sites on natural hardbottom approximately 150-230 m from shore
(named R-90, R-93, R-97, R-99, and R-101), and one site on an artificial
reef. The northernmost site, 122 m north of construction, was designated
the control site. Each site was permanently marked with stainless steel
pins delineating a 50 m long shore-perpendicular transect with a 1.0
m2 station at the east and west ends. All sites were assessed 1-month
pre- (between December 23, 2002 and January 10, 2003), mid- (February
17, 2003 to February 20, 2003), immediate post- (March 8, 2003 to March
10, 2003), 6-months post- (August 4, 2003 to August 6, 2003) and 12
months post-construction (March 8, 2004 to March 17, 2004). Benthic
cover and coral density along each transect was assessed with 16 0.0625
m2 quadrats (1.0 m2 total), and video for Point Count analysis. Benthic
cover and coral density was assessed in the two 1.0 m2 stations, and
digital images were taken. Benthic cover was assessed using standard
methods, i.e. FDEP modified AGRRA or BEAMR (Miller 2003; Baron and
Lybolt 2004). Large-scale sediment movements were tracked using a line-intercept
method. The 12-month post-construction dataset is available from the
Town of Palm Beach.
Fishes
were censused using stationary counts and timed swims at the five
natural hardbottom
sites, and at the Breakers Rock Pile high-relief
(BR-2) and low-relief (BR-1) stations. Stationary counts were made
using a modified version of Bohnsack and Bannerot’s (1986) method.
Timed swim counts were performed as a modification of Kimmel’s
(1985) method.
Visual fish censuses conducted during this field survey yielded the
fewest species and individuals yet recorded during the monitoring program.
Early life stages were not numerically dominant during this survey
as they were during previous surveys. Reasons for the general decline
in numbers and kinds of fishes observed during this survey were not
clear. Project-related habitat loss was only apparent at the inshore
Breakers Rock Pile station. Rough sea conditions may temporarily displace
shallow water inhabitants to deeper water, and before fishes were censused,
local sea conditions were very rough. Turbidity, however, was very
low during the field survey. Previous surveys of nearshore hardbottom
in Palm Beach County indicated that recruitment and settlement of grunts,
damselfishes, drums, and snappers were generally lowest during winter
and highest during spring, summer, and early fall. It was also possible
that the decrease in macroalgae cover has diminished the value of this
habitat as a grazing food source.
In
general, sand cover data gleaned from quadrat-transect assessments
were either
highly variable,
or increased from pre- to post-construction.
There were no transects with decreases from pre- to post-construction.
Analyses for significant changes were inconclusive in all tests. None
of the increases were significant (2-tail t-test p>0.05), but several
were marginally significant (2-tail -test 0.05<p<0.10). Overall,
the frequency of samples with 100% sand cover increased, despite a
decrease from post- to 6-months post-construction. Frequency of samples
with 100% sand cover at the control transect R-90, and at R-99 was
the same pre- and 12-months post-construction. At the other three transects,
the frequency of 100% sand covered quadrats was higher. Chance played
a role in the frequency data for R-99. Had we conducted transect sampling
several days earlier, R-99 would have had the first ever records of
sand-covered quadrats.
All methods detected considerable variability in biotic cover both
between sites and between sampling intervals. Line
intercept was a better measure of the large-scale sand masses and their
locations,
while Point Count analyses were very robust, relatively low-resolution
assessments of a large area (20 m2 site-1). Point Count detected a
significant decrease in macroalgae cover at all sites from 19% pre-
to 7% 12-months post-construction (2-tailed paired t-test p-0.0183,a=0.05).
This decline was ecologically relevant, since macroalgae comprise the
majority of benthic biota on the nearshore hardbottom on Palm Beach.
Total faunal cover was very low at all transects and all sampling intervals,
and was much too low for a valid analysis.
Quadrat-transect analyses were very high-resolution assessments of
a relatively small area (1 m2 site-1). Total biotic cover was highly
variable and, on average, essentially unchanged from pre- to 12-months
post-construction. Quadrat-transect analyses detected a significant
decrease in macroalgae cover at all sites from 26% pre- to 15% 12-months
post-construction (2-tailed paired t-test p-0.0435, a=0.05). There
was an increase in the frequency of 100% sand-covered quadrats at all
sites from 0.13 pre- to 0.36 12-months post-construction and this increase
was not significant (2-tailed paired t-test p-0.1172, a=0.05). The
increase in frequency of sand-covered quadrats did not correspond to
a decrease in total biotic cover, and there were insufficient data
to ascribe decreased macroalgae cover to increased sand cover. Because
quadrat-transect analyses are much more sensitive than Point Count,
there was considerably more variability in the dataset.
Unexpected rapid sediment movements were recorded at 4 of 5 sites
during the 12-month post-construction sampling event. Sediment movements
were measured over a 10 day period, twice before a high surf advisory,
and once after. Prior to the surf advisory at site R-90, a 12 m sand
bar disappeared in one day. Sand at site R-93 was exceptional in its
stability. There was little motion in the two day period preceding
the surf advisory, and a moderate 7.0 m extension of the sand bar seven
days later. At site R-97 a prominent 2.0 m wide sand bar developed
in one day. Seven days later this feature was still present, but had
moved 2.0 m east and extended to 4.0 m. At site R-99, prior to the
surf advisory, a 23.0 m wide sand bar moved 6.0 m west in two days
(Photo 1) and had disappeared from the site seven days later (Photo
2). R-99 had been uniquely free of sand bars for seven prior observations
over nine months. At site R-101 a discrete 21.0 m wide sand bar was
reduced to 16.0 m in 2 days. Seven days later it had increased to 21.0
m wide.
Top