Permits
issued for the beach nourishment project required the implementation of
an ongoing environmental monitoring program focused primarily on the biological
monitoring of nearshore hardbottom communities (located seaward of the
project equilibrium toe of fill). The environmental investigations of the
natural hardbottom habitats were conducted in conjunction with an assessment
of juvenile green turtle foraging habitat. The pre-construction, initial
post-construction, 1 year post-construction, and 2 year post-construction
environmental monitoring survey evaluations comply with the DEP environmental
monitoring permit requirements for the beach nourishment project.
Six fixed, one-square meter hardbottom monitoring stations were established
on February 14th and 15th, 2002, prior to beach nourishment construction.
Four of the stations are located directly seaward of the edge of the
project equilibrium toe of fill and two stations are control stations
located well beyond the equilibrium toe of fill. In addition to the monitoring
stations, two 30 m transects were permanently established at each location
for video documentation of the project equilibrium toe of fill adjustment
and for the assessment of sea turtle foraging habitat.
The pre-construction (March 13, 2002), initial post-construction (June
3, 2002), 1 year post-construction (April 24, 2003), and 2 year post-construction
(April/May 2004) biological monitoring surveys of the monitoring stations
and transect lines included a biological inventory and photo-documentation
of the epibenthos. The two 30 m transects were surveyed following the
AGRRA protocol for benthos. Following AGRRA methodology, a 25 x 25 cm
square quadrat was assessed at 3 m intervals along the 30 m transect
line. Conditions at the transect lines and monitoring stations were compared
to those recorded during pre-construction monitoring.
The overall impacts of the South Boca Beach Nourishment Project on the
hardbottom biological
community were limited immediately following
construction. Comparisons of the pre-construction and initial post-construction
surveys
revealed little changes in the flora and fauna observed along the
western edge of the transects (the area that would be impacted by
the toe of
fill). The changes that did initially occur took place along the
eastern edge of the transects, due to the westerly migration of an
offshore sandbar,
which is a natural phenomenon.
One year following construction, hardbottom impacts were evident at
4 of the 6 monitoring stations, including one of the two control stations.
Impacts may have been the result of an offshore sand source migrating
towards the shore, or from the loss of a portion of the advanced fill
berm as the beach began to transform to its equilibrium state, or a combination
of both. Results from the 2 year post-construction monitoring suggest
a landward movement of the ebb tidal shoal as the source of burial.
Investigations at the six locations within and adjacent to the project
area exhibited a diverse and productive biological community associated
with the nearshore hardbottom area that had little variation in abundance
and in species richness from pre-construction to 2 years post-construction.
Consistent for low relief nearshore hardbottom throughout Florida, the
benthic community within the project area supported flora and fauna common
to ephemeral habitats associated with the nearshore environment. Similar
to natural sand coverage events, short-term impacts to the benthic community
from beach nourishment projects are possible and have been previously
documented in South Florida. The extent of any long term or permanent
impact remains unclear because organisms in the nearshore community are
commonly impacted naturally from periodic burial episodes resulting from
storms and shifting sediment.
Top